Check out our FAQ's

  • A: It is hard to generalize about the prejudices of individual judges, but Colorado law does not discriminate against fathers, and in fact presumes that both parents should have substantial and frequent contact with their children. This does not mean, however, that parents will necessarily end up with a 50/50 parenting time arrangement. The physical proximity of the parents, their ability to co-parent after the divorce, and the wishes of the children are among the factors that are taken into consideration by Colorado judges in fashioning parenting time schedules. The guiding principle in this undertaking is not what is in a parent's best interests, but what is in the children's best interests. In custody cases, it is common for the court to appoint a child and family investigator, who is often a social worker or psychologist, to interview the parties, their friends and relatives, and the children, and make recommendations to the judge.
  • A: In Colorado, judges must first allocate to each spouse his or her separate property, and following that they are required to divide the couple's marital property in a "fair and equitable" manner. In Colorado there is no legal requirement for a 50/50 division of marital property. Factors such as one spouse having a large amount of separate property or a spouse making a disproportionate contribution to the accumulation of marital property can result in unequal property division.
  • A: Yes. However, there is no set period of time (e.g., 7 years) that parties must cohabitate to become married in the eyes of the law. Instead, whether parties are married depends upon their intent. In order to establish a common law marriage it must be proved that there was some form of mutual public acknowledgment of the marital relationship. Given the absence of a marriage ceremony, a mutual public acknowledgment of the marital relationship is usually proven by establishing the couples "general repute" as being married in their community. Friends, relatives and neighbors are therefore important witnesses in contested common law marriage cases because they can testify whether they understood the couple to be married or not and why. Other factors that judges can take into consideration besides cohabitation are whether the woman has taken the man's surname, whether children born to the couple have the man's surname, whether either or both parties wore wedding rings, whether the parties owned property together, and whether the couple filed income tax returns as a married couple.
  • A: The answer is sometimes. If a couple has been married a short time, have little or no marital property and no children, hiring a lawyer is probably not necessary. However, in cases in which there is substantial property, potentially undisclosed or undervalued assets, or disagreements regarding custody, spousal maintenance or child support, an experienced divorce attorney is needed. It is a particularly bad idea for one spouse to represent him or herself against a represented spouse. Colorado, like every other State, has an adversary system of justice which presumes that both sides in a dispute will effectively represent their own interests.
  • A: The answer is yes. Colorado judges have the authority to allocate legal expenses between the parties and it is common for judges to do this. Both sides have the right to competent legal counsel and in Colorado the law is clear that it is appropriate for legal expenses to be paid with marital funds regardless of which spouse controls these funds.

Contact Us Today

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy

Goff & Goff, LLC